Comments on: Is this evidence the bible is false?

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:52:06 +0000

God abolished the rules for clean and unclean animals to Cornelius. Cornelius had a vision in which the “unclean” animals were lowered on a sheet in front of him and God said to eat. Cornelius did not want to because the animals were unclean. God said “What God has cleansed, is not to be unclean to you”. He said ALL animals, fish, etc were now able to be eaten. This is in Acts 10.

Jesus also stated many times that all animals were excellent to eat, that they were not unclean anymore.

I guess you didn’t read that chapter.

By: not a top con & proud

not a top con & proud — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:27:02 +0000

No, you’re making assumptions. That clean is connected to excellent to eat.

You could just as easily say the distinctions were so god could eat all the oysters himself.

Some theories are that rules evolved to prevent eating things that caused problems, like those oysters. In a warm climate, with small sewage treatment. Oysters often aren’t excellent to eat as they are filled with bacteria. All those only eat oysters in months with an R in them folk sayings, say the same thing, don’t eat oysters in the summer.

Other theories point at the prohibition of pork and link it to most of the pork is a no no religions being located in areas where it isn’t cost productive to raise pigs. So only the rich get to eat pork becomes nobody eats pork. Notice how no religious conviction in a part of the world where pigs cost small or not anything to raise prohibit pork. Odin’s folk don’t need those acorns, so pork is somewhat holy.

Maybe this God just despises particular animals and wants them dead, after all, genesis claims he likes a excellent barbecue.

By: Wesley

Wesley — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:34:26 +0000

ok The Bible was not really written by God. It was written by men, lots of men accross a vast distance and over centuries. God may have communicated to some/all of them b ut not like we reckon of communication. God didn’t just start talking in the scribes ears. And just because God communicated to the authors what to write, doesn’t mean that they listened.
there’s 3 ways to interpret the bible:
1) the words of bible=the words of God
2) the words of God are contained in the words of novelist of the bible (which i beleive) this one is focused on the bible as open interpretation, full of metaphores and allagory as well as history
3)bible=literature/work of fiction

By: El Ateo

El Ateo — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:28:56 +0000

Like the saying goes: “you can take the jackass to the pond, but you can’t make him drink”. No matter how much logical explanation you give them, they won’t give up their imaginary friend!

By: Thomas H

Thomas H — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:06:59 +0000

That would be evidence that you do not read well. Try to slow down.

By: Christians 4 Jews

Christians 4 Jews — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:25:26 +0000

Matthew 15:11
What goes into a man’s backtalk does not make him ‘unclean,’ but what comes out of his backtalk, that is what makes him ‘unclean.’ “

By: Rod

Rod — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:23:02 +0000

Dude, in the first sentence of the first chapter I knew it was fake so why dissipate your time trying to prove it. Christians will not believe you and the normal among us don’t care!

By: tcjstn

tcjstn — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:30:07 +0000

Are you talking about today’s food or 2000 years ago?

By: Richard R

Richard R — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:41:49 +0000

Yes you are right and here is yet another one

MATT 20:12 reads

All Gods must be tested and if they fail he/she/it does not exist. If any human makes a claim about the existence of a god then extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Now we must test according to the person’s claim that their small god is (omnipotent) and werethy of our worship?

——————
The God does not exist Hypothesis’s
——————
Hypothesis: Does your God Exist?

Data Collection and Test:

This test will show either the gods/devils are not as powerful as claimed or they do not exist at all, in either case they do not deserve anyone’s worship.

Here is a simple god/devil test
1. God you will post on every Forum, Blog, FAQ and Yahoo Answers Category on the internet in just so 30 seconds (GMT) after this post has been made. You will post world wide and your post will state the following:

“I am god, I exist”

A) In every Forum, Blog, FAQ and Yahoo Answers Category must have the same exact time stamp based on human time GMT.

2. Mr. Devil you will post on every Forum, Blog, FAQ and Yahoo Answers Category on the internet in just so 30 seconds (GMT) after this post has been made. You will post world wide and your post will state the following:

“I am devil, I exist”

A) In every Forum, Blog, FAQ and Yahoo Answers Category must have the same exact time stamp based on human time GMT.

This simple test shows the devil does not exist and god does not exist. Furthermore, there is not anything that states we can not test the devil or god for that mater.

The bible only states its believers do not test god.

On the other hand there is not anything written anywhere that states we should not or can not test the devil so we tested both for completeness.

Note that since god and devil are two dependent deities, if we show one does not exist then the other does not exist.

Theory God does not exist
**We have shown that gods of any kind do not exit exists
**There is no god and there is no devil

Now more pleased times are a head for all people

By: Cat_LoveR

Cat_LoveR — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:39:44 +0000